Design a Distributed Job Scheduler
Variants:
Distributed Job Scheduler Requirements
Functional Requirements
Schedule Jobs
Schedule jobs across a fleet of worker nodes based on availability and workload.
Handle Multiple Job Types
Handle multiple job types, including data processing, image rendering, and report generation.
Store Job Metadata and Results
Efficiently store job metadata and results.
Timely Execution
The system should execute jobs within 2 seconds of their scheduled time.
Monitor and Log Job Status
Able to monitor and log job status.
Non-Functional Requirements
Fault Tolerance
The system should be fault-tolerant and handle retries.
Scalability
Scalability to handle a large number of jobs and worker nodes.
CAP Theorem Trade-offs
Trade-off Explanation:
For a job scheduler, we prioritize Availability and Partition Tolerance (AP). It's more important for the system to be available to accept and schedule new jobs than to have strict consistency. We can build in mechanisms to handle potential duplicate job executions, but the system should not go down in the event of a network partition.
Scale Estimates
API Design
The API for our job scheduler will be simple, with a single endpoint for creating new jobs. The client will specify the job type and any necessary parameters, and the scheduler will take care of the rest.
Create a new job
Database Schema
The database schema for our job scheduler will be simple, with a single table to store job metadata and results. We'll use a NoSQL database like DynamoDB for its scalability and flexibility.
The jobs table will be the core of our system, with the job_id as the primary key. We'll also include fields for the job type, parameters, status, and the result of the job.
jobs
High-Level Architecture
The architecture for our distributed job scheduler will consist of a few key components: a Job Service for creating jobs, a Scheduling/Worker Service for executing them, and a message queue for communication.
Core Services
-
Job Service: This service is responsible for handling incoming job requests from clients. It will validate the request, assign a unique ID to the job, and store the job metadata in the database. It will then enqueue the job in the appropriate message queue based on the job type.
-
Scheduling/Worker Service: This service is responsible for executing the jobs. It will consist of a fleet of worker nodes that consume jobs from the message queues. Each worker node will be capable of executing any type of job, or we can have specialized worker nodes for different job types.
Deep Dive: Job Orchestration
A key challenge in a distributed job scheduler is orchestrating the execution of jobs. Your interviewer will want to know how you would manage the lifecycle of a job, from creation to completion, and how you would handle failures and retries.
Apache Airflow
Why: Airflow is a mature, battle-tested workflow orchestration platform that is excellent for managing complex job dependencies and scheduling.
How it works: We can define our job workflows as Airflow DAGs. When a new job is created, it triggers a new DAG run. Airflow will then manage the execution of the job, including any dependencies, retries, and failure handling.
Trade-offs:
- Pros: Powerful and flexible, with a large community and many pre-built integrations.
- Cons: Can have significant operational overhead. The scheduling-based model may not be the best fit for event-driven workflows.
Temporal
Why: Temporal is a more modern, code-first workflow engine that is particularly well-suited for long-running, stateful jobs.
How it works: With Temporal, the entire job workflow is defined as a single function. Temporal's durable execution model ensures that the workflow's state is preserved across failures, so if a worker crashes during a long-running job, it can resume from where it left off.
Trade-offs:
- Pros: More developer-friendly programming model. Excellent for long-running, stateful jobs.
- Cons: Newer technology with a smaller ecosystem than Airflow.
Deep Dive: Job Idempotency
In a distributed system, it's possible for a job to be executed more than once due to network failures or other issues. Your interviewer will want to know how you would ensure that a job is not processed multiple times.
Idempotency
Idempotency is the property of certain operations in mathematics and computer science that they can be applied multiple times without changing the result beyond the initial application. In the context of a job scheduler, this means that if a job is executed multiple times, the outcome should be the same as if it were executed only once.
Kafka Dead Letter Queues
Why: Kafka's Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) feature is a great way to handle retries and ensure idempotency.
How it works: When a worker node fails to process a job, it can send the job to a DLQ. A separate worker can then process the jobs in the DLQ, or we can manually inspect the jobs to determine the cause of the failure. This ensures that we don't lose any jobs, and it gives us a way to handle failures gracefully.
Trade-offs:
- Pros: Simple to implement, provides a built-in mechanism for handling failures.
- Cons: Can be difficult to manage at scale.
Amazon SQS with a Distributed Lock
Why: Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that makes it easy to build scalable, distributed applications. We can use SQS in combination with a distributed lock to ensure that a job is not processed multiple times.
How it works: When a worker node receives a job from SQS, it first tries to acquire a distributed lock for that job using a service like Redis. If it succeeds, it processes the job and then deletes it from the queue. If it fails to acquire the lock, it means that another worker is already processing the job, so it can safely ignore it.
Trade-offs:
- Pros: Highly scalable and reliable.
- Cons: Adds another component to the system (the distributed lock manager).
Complete Design
Now that we've covered all the major components individually, let's look at how everything fits together in our complete distributed job scheduler system design. This diagram shows the end-to-end flow from job creation to execution.
The complete architecture demonstrates how clients submit jobs to the Job Service, which then enqueues them in a message queue. The Scheduling/Worker Service, orchestrated by a workflow engine like Airflow or Temporal, consumes these jobs and executes them across a fleet of worker nodes. This design ensures a scalable, reliable, and fault-tolerant system for executing a wide variety of jobs.